Scotland's Decision: A constitutional chain reaction?

Published: 19 September 2014

Professor Charlie Jeffery, Director of the ESRC Future of the UK and Scotland teams, looks at the implications of the Prime Minister’s statement on the victory of the No campaign in the independence referendum.

The referendum has been won by the Conservatives and their allies under the banner of Better Together. The issue that is now attracting attention of Conservative MPs in Westminster is what an enhanced constitutional settlement for Scotland might mean for England. They argue that it would be untenable to extend devolution powers to Scotland without taking into an account the effect this will have on England and law making for that nation.

So the Prime Minister seems to be dusting down the McKay Commission report of early 2013. To declare an interest, I was one of the members of the Commission. We proposed a solution to the fact that Scottish MPs could vote on issues at Westminster that affected just England.

The solution? Boosting the role of MPs from England when considering such legislation.

So: more powers for Scotland is not straightforward. There’s now a constitutional chain reaction…where will it end?

Is Brexit eroding the Sewel convention?

Sturgeon is strong enough to reject the Catalan path

Why this Irish general election is important for the UK's constitutional future

Stormont Restored: New Decade, New Approach?

Northern Ireland and Unionism

RT @PolStudiesAssoc: ???? Competition Alert ???? We've gone live with the photography competition for the upcoming PSAconference #PSA20 - open…

1 hour ago

RT @AkashPaun: The Welsh, Scottish and Northern Ireland parliaments have all voted to withhold consent for the Withdrawal Agreement Bill. T…

1 hour ago

CCC's @McEwen_Nicola wrote a blog to coincide with the launch of @SPICe_Research post-Brexit hub exploring the limi…

3 hours ago

Michael Keating discussing the critical Scottish #elections next May and their impact on Scottish #independence…

18 hours ago