Scotland's Decision: A constitutional chain reaction?

Published: 19 September 2014

Professor Charlie Jeffery, Director of the ESRC Future of the UK and Scotland teams, looks at the implications of the Prime Minister’s statement on the victory of the No campaign in the independence referendum.

The referendum has been won by the Conservatives and their allies under the banner of Better Together. The issue that is now attracting attention of Conservative MPs in Westminster is what an enhanced constitutional settlement for Scotland might mean for England. They argue that it would be untenable to extend devolution powers to Scotland without taking into an account the effect this will have on England and law making for that nation.

So the Prime Minister seems to be dusting down the McKay Commission report of early 2013. To declare an interest, I was one of the members of the Commission. We proposed a solution to the fact that Scottish MPs could vote on issues at Westminster that affected just England.

The solution? Boosting the role of MPs from England when considering such legislation.

So: more powers for Scotland is not straightforward. There’s now a constitutional chain reaction…where will it end?

Whatever happened to Tory unionism?

The Backstop is Gone. Welcome to the Backstop.

Boris makes the great leap

Attempts to stop abortion law changes in Northern Ireland have failed. @jevershed01 evaluates the DUP's strategy an…

39 minutes ago

RT @DaniCetra: A very topical academic article ???? 'The Emergence and Transformation of Self-determination Claims in #HongKong and #Cataloni…

1 hour ago

RT @ja_sheldon: Me and @michaelkenny_ have a new blog post on @CCC_Research, trying to explain the Tories' u-turn on divergence between GB…

1 hour ago

RT @UKandEU: Did you catch @anandmenon1 talking about our economic analysis of Boris Johnson's deal on @BBCNewsnight on Friday? The deal…

2 hours ago