Mapping the Rise of the Radical Right

The rise of the populist radical right in Europe is a topic that worries citizens, journalists, political elites and scholars alike. Much has been written on the nature of these parties, as well as why they are currently gaining in the political arena. This has focused on the institutional arrangement of different electoral systems and the dissimilar opportunities that they offer for the thriving of this kind of party; or on the demand side trying to unravel the reasons behind citizens’ voting behavior.

This strong emphasis on the behavior of citizens seems somehow unfair to them. Whether in contrast to the emphasis placed on the role played by citizens, or possibly in conjunction with it, it is worth considering the role played by mainstream parties, which has been a considerable factor in the rise of the populist right. Furthermore, and most importantly, is the role they must play if the current situation is to be reversed.

This situation is set out in the mind map below, which also details some of the most important bibliographical references.

View the detailed diagram >>

View - Mainstream parties and radical populism in Europe

As demonstrated, European mainstream parties pay a two-fold role: both in the origin and also in the resolution of the increasing electoral relevance of populist radical right parties (RRP) in Europe. They have played an important role in the origin enabling the contextual conditions for the current reinforcement and electoral success of RRP. They have done so by the progressive abandonment of the social-class cleavage and the discourses of equality and social justice, by the ideological convergence toward neo-liberal economic policies, and by their estrangement from their representative function. It is evident from these, that I hold leftist parties to be particularly responsible for this situation, although rightist parties are not free from blame.

However, it is for this same reason that, although all mainstream parties may contribute to the solution, it is probably the left who should lead the change. In termsof identifying a solution, the future development of our democratic societies will depend on the answer mainstream parties are able to give to the new electoral cleavages presented by the populist radical right in electoral competition. The essential choice is between emulating the discourses and strategies of RRP or, on the contrary, bringing new, or recovering old, dimensions of electoral competition that appeal to citizens while still being inclusive.

It seems most feasible that the best option is to recover both the cleavage based on social class and return to discourses of equality and social justice linked to welfare state. Not only do these have a tradition in European political tradition (even of a populist nature), they can also be considered to have the potential for crafting inclusive and transversal national identities.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Antonia Ruiz's picture
post by Antonia Ruiz
Universidad Pablo de Olavide
24th April 2018
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 17th January 2019

    Richard Parry assesses a memorable day in UK parliamentary history as the Commons splits 432-202 on 15 January 2019 against the Government's recommended Brexit route. It was the most dramatic night at Westminster since the Labour government’s defeat on a confidence motion in 1979.

  • 17th January 2019

    What is the Irish government’s Brexit wish-list? The suggestion that Irish unity, as opposed to safeguarding political and economic stability, is the foremost concern of the Irish government is to misunderstand and misrepresent the motivations of this key Brexit stakeholder, writes Mary C. Murphy (University College Cork).

  • 17th January 2019

    Brexit is in trouble but not because of the Irish backstop, argues the CCC's Michael Keating.

  • 16th January 2019

    Fellows of the Centre on Constitutional Change respond to the rejection of the Withdrawal Agreement by the House of Commons and the impending no-confidence vote in the government.

  • 11th January 2019

    Richard Parry assesses the unfolding drama at Westminster around no-deal scenarios. The deal ‘would be an uncomfortable outcome for the EU: providing quota-fee, tariff-free access to the EU market without any accompanying financial obligations; without any access to UK fishing waters in the absence of further agreement; and without any commitments to align with the majority of so-called level playing field arrangements’. For Tory leavers, what’s not to like in this negotiating triumph for Theresa May?

Read More Posts