Mapping the Rise of the Radical Right

The rise of the populist radical right in Europe is a topic that worries citizens, journalists, political elites and scholars alike. Much has been written on the nature of these parties, as well as why they are currently gaining in the political arena. This has focused on the institutional arrangement of different electoral systems and the dissimilar opportunities that they offer for the thriving of this kind of party; or on the demand side trying to unravel the reasons behind citizens’ voting behavior.

This strong emphasis on the behavior of citizens seems somehow unfair to them. Whether in contrast to the emphasis placed on the role played by citizens, or possibly in conjunction with it, it is worth considering the role played by mainstream parties, which has been a considerable factor in the rise of the populist right. Furthermore, and most importantly, is the role they must play if the current situation is to be reversed.

This situation is set out in the mind map below, which also details some of the most important bibliographical references.

View the detailed diagram >>

View - Mainstream parties and radical populism in Europe

As demonstrated, European mainstream parties pay a two-fold role: both in the origin and also in the resolution of the increasing electoral relevance of populist radical right parties (RRP) in Europe. They have played an important role in the origin enabling the contextual conditions for the current reinforcement and electoral success of RRP. They have done so by the progressive abandonment of the social-class cleavage and the discourses of equality and social justice, by the ideological convergence toward neo-liberal economic policies, and by their estrangement from their representative function. It is evident from these, that I hold leftist parties to be particularly responsible for this situation, although rightist parties are not free from blame.

However, it is for this same reason that, although all mainstream parties may contribute to the solution, it is probably the left who should lead the change. In termsof identifying a solution, the future development of our democratic societies will depend on the answer mainstream parties are able to give to the new electoral cleavages presented by the populist radical right in electoral competition. The essential choice is between emulating the discourses and strategies of RRP or, on the contrary, bringing new, or recovering old, dimensions of electoral competition that appeal to citizens while still being inclusive.

It seems most feasible that the best option is to recover both the cleavage based on social class and return to discourses of equality and social justice linked to welfare state. Not only do these have a tradition in European political tradition (even of a populist nature), they can also be considered to have the potential for crafting inclusive and transversal national identities.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Antonia Ruiz's picture
post by Antonia Ruiz
Universidad Pablo de Olavide
24th April 2018
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 10th August 2018

    Brexit is re-making the UK’s constitution under our noses. The territorial constitution is particularly fragile. Pursuing Brexit, Theresa May’s government has stumbled into deep questions about devolution.

  • 8th August 2018

    The UK in a Changing Europe has formed a new Brexit Policy Panel (BPP). The BPP is a cross-disciplinary group of over 100 leading social scientists created to provide ongoing analysis of where we have got to in the Brexit process, and to forecast where we are headed. Members of the UK in a Changing Europe Brexit Policy Panel complete a monthly survey addressing three key areas of uncertainty around Brexit: if —and when—the UK will leave the EU; how Brexit will affect British politics; and what our relationship with the EU is likely to look like in the future. The CCC participates on the Panel.

  • 2nd August 2018

    The House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee issued its report ‘Devolution and Exiting the EU: reconciling differences and building strong relationships’. Discussing its contents, Professor Nicola McEwen suggests that the report includes some practical recommendations, some of which were informed by CCC research. It also shines a light on some of the more difficult challenges ahead.

  • 31st July 2018

    The politicisation of Brexit, combined with deteriorating relations between London and Dublin, has created a toxic atmosphere in Northern Ireland, says Mary Murphy, which will require imagination and possibly new institutions to resolve.

  • 25th July 2018

    Given that there are many policy differences between Northern Ireland and other parts of the UK, asks Jonathan Evershed, why has customs policy been singled out as a red line by Unionists?

Read More Posts