Following the election result some pundits have suggested that English votes for English laws might be an obstacle to the government, given its reliance on support from non-English MPs, whilst others have suggested the procedures might provide the government with an enhanced English majority. In this post Daniel Gover and Michael Kenny explain that neither of these possibilities is likely to occur.
Daniel Gover and Michael Kenny of the Mile End Institute, Queen Mary University of London assess English votes for English laws a year after its introduction.
As the House of Commons prepares for its first taste of English Votes on English Laws (EVEL), Michael Kenny, CCC Fellow, discusses public reaction with Mark D'Arcy on BBC Radio Four. (10.30 onwards)
Michael Kenny and Daniel Gover consider the constitutional implications of parliament's approval of English Votes for English Laws. This article was first published on the Constitution Unit blog.
The decision by MPs to approve changes to the House of Commons Standing Orders that implement the principle of ‘English votes for English laws’ (EVEL) may prove controversial.