What We’re Reading: Brexit & Indyref2

On our blog, fellows and friends of the centre reflect on ongoing Brexit debates, implications for party politics, and the prospect of Indyref2. Michael Keating addresses the question of whether Scotland and Northern Ireland can remain within the single market and within the UK union, concluding that such a system would not be acceptable either to the UK or to the European Union. Kirsty Hughes examines how such an approach might be made to work, political obstacles notwithstanding. Writing before SNP Conference, both James Mitchell and Paul Cairney assesses Nicola Sturgeon’s strategic approach to the independence referendum, with James stressing the importance of timing while Paul identifies three unresolved issues which may impact the vote.
 
At NIESR, Angus Armstrong discusses the fall of the pound and its implications for British consumers, warning of rises in the price of food and energy and the potential for inflation. On the UK Constitutional Law Association blog, Sionaidh Douglas-Scott assesses the ‘Great Repeal Bill’, identifying legal issues as well as implications for devolved entities. At the LSE British Politics and Policy, Charlotte Galpin expresses concern that Boris Johnson might harm German support for the United Kingdom, with a negative impact on trade. At Cardiff’s Thinking Wales, Jac Larner examines gender and the National Assembly for Wales. Writing at What Scotland Thinks prior to the SNP conference, John Curtice examines changes within the SNP, noting that it is both a party in pursuit of political power but also a ‘movement motivated by an idea’.  At What UK Thinks EU, John Curtice explores the key concerns for voters in the EU ref.
 
Elsewhere, Nicola McEwen spoke at a Scottish Fabians conference on Scotland, the Union, and Brexit, an event which was covered in The Herald. Nicola also presented at the Bilbao European Encounters 2016 conference.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

University of Edinburgh
20th October 2016
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 18th May 2018

    Different political actors have responded to the decision by the Scottish Parliament to withhold its consent for the UK Government’s showpiece EU (Withdrawal) Bill in very different ways. Prof Nicola McEwen sifts the facts from the hyperbole and explains where we are and where we go from here.

  • 15th May 2018

    On 8 May the UK’s House of Lords passed an amendment to require the House of Commons to vote on remaining in the European Economic Area (EEA), the possibility of Britain adopting the so-called ‘Norway model’ is back on the agenda of British politics. Here the authors of Squaring the Circle on Brexit: Could the Norway Model Work?, John Erik Fossum and Hans Petter Graver, give some background to Norway’s relationship with the European Union and reveal the truth behind some common myths about the Norway model.

  • 4th May 2018

    The Sewel Convention has historically worked well, says Michael Keating, but Brexit will put it to the test.

  • 3rd May 2018

    Amendments to controversial Clause 11 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill were agreed in the House of Lords yesterday evening, following a deal between the UK and Welsh governments last week. Jack Sheldon and Mike Kenny explain the significance of this agreement for the UK as a whole and outline a number of unresolved issues it raises.

  • 2nd May 2018

    The hesitant progress of Brexit legislation through Westminster has provided parliament with an opportunity to show its teeth and, says Tobias Lock, it demonstrates that the legislature has bite as well as bark.

Read More Posts