Mapping the Rise of the Radical Right

The rise of the populist radical right in Europe is a topic that worries citizens, journalists, political elites and scholars alike. Much has been written on the nature of these parties, as well as why they are currently gaining in the political arena. This has focused on the institutional arrangement of different electoral systems and the dissimilar opportunities that they offer for the thriving of this kind of party; or on the demand side trying to unravel the reasons behind citizens’ voting behavior.

This strong emphasis on the behavior of citizens seems somehow unfair to them. Whether in contrast to the emphasis placed on the role played by citizens, or possibly in conjunction with it, it is worth considering the role played by mainstream parties, which has been a considerable factor in the rise of the populist right. Furthermore, and most importantly, is the role they must play if the current situation is to be reversed.

This situation is set out in the mind map below, which also details some of the most important bibliographical references.

View the detailed diagram >>

View - Mainstream parties and radical populism in Europe

As demonstrated, European mainstream parties pay a two-fold role: both in the origin and also in the resolution of the increasing electoral relevance of populist radical right parties (RRP) in Europe. They have played an important role in the origin enabling the contextual conditions for the current reinforcement and electoral success of RRP. They have done so by the progressive abandonment of the social-class cleavage and the discourses of equality and social justice, by the ideological convergence toward neo-liberal economic policies, and by their estrangement from their representative function. It is evident from these, that I hold leftist parties to be particularly responsible for this situation, although rightist parties are not free from blame.

However, it is for this same reason that, although all mainstream parties may contribute to the solution, it is probably the left who should lead the change. In termsof identifying a solution, the future development of our democratic societies will depend on the answer mainstream parties are able to give to the new electoral cleavages presented by the populist radical right in electoral competition. The essential choice is between emulating the discourses and strategies of RRP or, on the contrary, bringing new, or recovering old, dimensions of electoral competition that appeal to citizens while still being inclusive.

It seems most feasible that the best option is to recover both the cleavage based on social class and return to discourses of equality and social justice linked to welfare state. Not only do these have a tradition in European political tradition (even of a populist nature), they can also be considered to have the potential for crafting inclusive and transversal national identities.

Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to info@centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

Antonia Ruiz's picture
post by Antonia Ruiz
Universidad Pablo de Olavide
24th April 2018
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 12th February 2019

    CCC Fellow Professor Daniel Wincott of Cardiff University examines how Brexit processes have already reshaped territorial politics in the UK and changed its territorial constitution.

  • 7th February 2019

    The future of agriculture policy across the United Kingdom after Brexit is uncertain and risky, according to a new paper by Professor Michael Keating of the Centre on Constitutional Change. Reforms of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy over recent years have shifted the emphasis from farming to the broader concept of rural policy. As member states have gained more discretion in applying policy, the nations of the UK have also diverged, according to local conditions and preferences.

  • 4th February 2019

    In our latest report for the "Repatriation of Competences: Implications for Devolution" project, Professor Nicola McEwen and Dr Alexandra Remond examine how, in the longer term, Brexit poses significant risks for the climate and energy ambitions of the devolved nations. These include the loss of European Structural and Investment Funds targeted at climate and low carbon energy policies, from which the devolved territories have benefited disproportionately. European Investment Bank loan funding, which has financed high risk renewables projects, especially in Scotland, may also no longer be as accessible, while future access to research and innovation funding remains uncertain. The removal of the EU policy framework, which has incentivised the low carbon ambitions of the devolved nations may also result in lost opportunities.

  • 1st February 2019

    The outcome of the various Commons votes this week left certain only that the Government would either secure an amended deal and put it to a meaningful vote on Wednesday 13 February, or in the overwhelmingly likely absence of this make a further statement that day and table another amendable motion for the following day, the Groundhog Day that may lead to a ‘St Valentine’s Day Massacre’ for one side or the other. Richard Parry assesses the further two-week pause in parliamentary action on Brexit

  • 24th January 2019

    Concerns about the implications of the Irish backstop for the integrity of the domestic Union contributed significantly to the scale of the 118-strong backbench rebellion that led to Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement being defeated last week, by the extraordinary margin of 432 to 202. What do the arguments made during the Commons debate tell us about the nature of the ‘unionism’ that prevails in the contemporary Conservative Party?

Read More Posts