Class divisions and the Scottish Referendum

The Scottish Independence referendum campaign has focused heavily on the economic impacts of independence –whether the No campaign’s claims of a “UK dividend” or the Yes campaign’s promise of an economic renaissance for a newly independent Scotland. But how do voters’ own economic situations affect their preferences for independence?

The graph below shows the level of support for independence among voters in different social classes (coded based on respondents’ current or most recent occupation). Support for independence is highest among supervisors, small business owners and routine workers (e.g. assembly line workers, waiters and cleaners), with intermediate workers (e.g. secretaries and computer operators) and senior managers showing the lowest support for independence.


This divide over the referendum is somewhat different to the main class divides in British politics. For instance, below is the proportion of voters in each class who intend to vote for Labour (across the whole of the UK). In this case, there is a clear gradient in support from the highest social groups to the lowest (with the exception of small employers). Thus, while voters in the Scottish referendum are divided by class, they aren’t falling along the same working/middle class division that has traditionally structured party competition in the UK.


It’s not just class that’s dividing voters. Some of the largest differences in support for independence are between renters and home owners. On average, only 32% of freehold home owners support independence compared to nearly more than half of people who rent their property from a council or housing association. One possible explanation for these differences is the circulation of reports claiming that mortgages will become more expensive and house prices may fall if Scotland becomes independent.


Some of these economic differences in independence support can be explained by differences in political values. Economically left wing voters are far more likely to support independence than voters on the right. Economic values can explain much of the difference between home owners and renters as well as the difference between senior managers and routine workers. Other groups’ support, though, is harder to explain. Small business owners –often a conservative leaning group –are among the strongest supporters of independence (although a majority still oppose it).

Regardless of the eventual outcome of the referendum, these divisions could have a lasting impact on politics long after September in the patterns of support for the SNP.


Technical note: The first wave of the British Election Study was conducted between February and March 2014. Of the 4139 Scottish voters interviewed, 3615 reported how they intend to vote in the upcoming referendum. All of the analysis in this post focuses only on respondents who expressed a preference one way or the other.  Social class is only coded for around half the sample so the figures in that figure will change slightly once the full sample is coded.


Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to

Jon Mellon's picture
post by Jon Mellon
Nuffield College at the University of Oxford
19th June 2014
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 16th August 2018

    A week after the state of intergovernmental relations (IGR) in the UK was highlighted by the UK government’s law officers standing in opposition to their devolved counterparts in the UK Supreme Court, the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee published a report on improving IGR after Brexit. Jack Sheldon discusses the methods by which England could gain distinct representation — something it currently lacks — in a new IGR system.

  • 10th August 2018

    Brexit is re-making the UK’s constitution under our noses. The territorial constitution is particularly fragile. Pursuing Brexit, Theresa May’s government has stumbled into deep questions about devolution.

  • 8th August 2018

    The UK in a Changing Europe has formed a new Brexit Policy Panel (BPP). The BPP is a cross-disciplinary group of over 100 leading social scientists created to provide ongoing analysis of where we have got to in the Brexit process, and to forecast where we are headed. Members of the UK in a Changing Europe Brexit Policy Panel complete a monthly survey addressing three key areas of uncertainty around Brexit: if —and when—the UK will leave the EU; how Brexit will affect British politics; and what our relationship with the EU is likely to look like in the future. The CCC participates on the Panel.

  • 2nd August 2018

    The House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee issued its report ‘Devolution and Exiting the EU: reconciling differences and building strong relationships’. Discussing its contents, Professor Nicola McEwen suggests that the report includes some practical recommendations, some of which were informed by CCC research. It also shines a light on some of the more difficult challenges ahead.

  • 31st July 2018

    The politicisation of Brexit, combined with deteriorating relations between London and Dublin, has created a toxic atmosphere in Northern Ireland, says Mary Murphy, which will require imagination and possibly new institutions to resolve.

Read More Posts