Brexit Reflections - When you play the Game of Thrones, you win or you die

Kirstein Rummery explains that the key to the outcome (as indeed to the independence referendum in 2014) seems to be people’s attitude to risk.

So, the decision to take a fight that was never really finished in the Eton tuck shop about the leadership of the Conservative party out onto the streets of the UK appears to have backfired. Over 17m people in the UK voted to leave the EU in a result that took everyone, particularly the leaders of both sides, by surprise.

Lord Ashcroft’s poll indicates that people votes on clear income, age, class and regional divides. Older voters, low income voters, people without children; people living in deprived areas of Wales, the Northwest and Southwest voted overwhelmingly to leave; younger voters, voters in the higher income and education bracket, people with children, and Scotland, Northern Ireland and London voted overwhelmingly to remain.

The key to the outcome (as indeed to the independence referendum in 2014) seems to be people’s attitude to risk. Ashcroft summed it up thus:

  • More than three quarters (77%) of those who voted to remain thought “the decision we make in the referendum could have disastrous consequences for us as a country if we get it wrong”. More than two thirds (69%) of leavers, by contrast, thought the decision “might make us a bit better or worse off as a country, but there probably isn’t much in it either way”.

In the short term, of course, the Remain camp called it right: we see a leadership crisis and a fundamental political split in both the Conservative and Labour parties, the economy has gone into freefall, and there has been a significant and worrying rise in racial abuse reported. My own inbox is filled with worried emails from EU students and colleagues worried not just about their future but about their present circumstances: the shock of waking up to a country where, if Ashcroft is to be believed, over 5 million of your fellow citizens actively want you GONE is profound.

It is too soon to predict the long term outcome: the most dramatic scenario is that the UK never recovers from the current economic freefall predicted by both sides; that we do our Walk of Shame as we exit the EU punished as brutally as possible to deter future possible Exiters; that this triggers a second independence referendum in Scotland won under the seemingly calm leadership of Nicola Sturgeon ; and that the shockwaves across Europe in terms of economic instability and the rise of the Far Right last beyond a generation.

Or, possibly, there’s a wee bit of tumult as the Game of Thrones is played out in the corridors of Brussels and Westminster, an amicable Article 50 settlement is reached (or indeed they never call our bluff and the EU gives enough concessions to make the triggering of it unnecessary), everyone calms down and ordinary citizens go on with their lives, travelling, working, studying as if nothing happened.

I don’t believe this, but then again, I never thought Jon Snow would come back to life either, so I am one of the hundreds of ‘experts’ who got this wrong. I hope I am wrong again.


Comments policy

All comments posted on the site via Disqus are automatically published. Additionally comments are sent to moderators for checking and removal if necessary. We encourage open debate and real time commenting on the website. The Centre on Constitutional Change cannot be held responsible for any content posted by users. Any complaints about comments on the site should be sent to

Kirstein Rummery's picture
University of Stirling
27th June 2016
Filed under:

Latest blogs

  • 16th August 2018

    A week after the state of intergovernmental relations (IGR) in the UK was highlighted by the UK government’s law officers standing in opposition to their devolved counterparts in the UK Supreme Court, the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee published a report on improving IGR after Brexit. Jack Sheldon discusses the methods by which England could gain distinct representation — something it currently lacks — in a new IGR system.

  • 10th August 2018

    Brexit is re-making the UK’s constitution under our noses. The territorial constitution is particularly fragile. Pursuing Brexit, Theresa May’s government has stumbled into deep questions about devolution.

  • 8th August 2018

    The UK in a Changing Europe has formed a new Brexit Policy Panel (BPP). The BPP is a cross-disciplinary group of over 100 leading social scientists created to provide ongoing analysis of where we have got to in the Brexit process, and to forecast where we are headed. Members of the UK in a Changing Europe Brexit Policy Panel complete a monthly survey addressing three key areas of uncertainty around Brexit: if —and when—the UK will leave the EU; how Brexit will affect British politics; and what our relationship with the EU is likely to look like in the future. The CCC participates on the Panel.

  • 2nd August 2018

    The House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee issued its report ‘Devolution and Exiting the EU: reconciling differences and building strong relationships’. Discussing its contents, Professor Nicola McEwen suggests that the report includes some practical recommendations, some of which were informed by CCC research. It also shines a light on some of the more difficult challenges ahead.

  • 31st July 2018

    The politicisation of Brexit, combined with deteriorating relations between London and Dublin, has created a toxic atmosphere in Northern Ireland, says Mary Murphy, which will require imagination and possibly new institutions to resolve.

Read More Posts